Core Refusal Reason
The proposal was refused due to the extension's overbearing design and lack of subservience to the host dwelling, combined with an excessively sized shed that lacks justification and a Visual Impact Assessment within a High Amenity (HA) zone.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The extension's excessive protrusion and prominent western positioning create an overbearing, non-subservient structure that negatively impacts the visual and residential amenity of the area.
- The proposed steel shed is considered excessive in scale, not ancillary to the main dwelling, and lacks a required Visual Impact Assessment for the High Amenity (HA) zone.
- The development contravenes specific policies of the Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029 and would set an undesirable precedent for large-scale, unjustified structures in a protected landscape.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy SPQHP41Objective SPQHO45Table 14.2HA zoning objectiveFingal Development Plan 2023-2029
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought permission for a single-storey rear extension and a large steel shed at Rose Cottage, Tooman, Lusk, a site located within a High Amenity (HA) zoning area. Fingal County Council refused the application because the extension's design was deemed visually intrusive and failed to remain subservient to the original cottage. Additionally, the proposed shed was found to be disproportionately large for domestic needs and lacked the necessary visual impact documentation required to pr...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.