Core Refusal Reason
The proposed external finishes are considered seriously out of character with the existing built environment of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed alterations to the external finishes are significantly inconsistent with the established architectural character of the neighborhood.
- The development fails to maintain visual harmony with the existing built form of Ailesbury Grove.
- The proposal is contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area due to its negative impact on local character.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought to substitute external finishes at 66 Ailesbury Grove, Dundrum, from those previously permitted under reference D22A/0556. The local authority refused permission because the revised finishes were deemed to be seriously out of character with the existing built form of the surrounding area. As a result, the development was considered inconsistent with the principles of proper planning and sustainable development for the locality....SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.