Core Refusal Reason
The proposal's excessive scale, bulk, and pastiche design are contextually inappropriate for the Foxrock Architectural Conservation Area (ACA).
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development's excessive scale, bulk, and massing would result in a visually dominant and obtrusive form.
- The pastiche design and inappropriate roof form fail to respect or enhance the special character of the Foxrock Architectural Conservation Area.
- The proposal is contrary to specific County Development Plan policies and would set an undesirable precedent for the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy Objective HER13Section 12.11.4
Decision Document Summary
This application sought the demolition of the front and rear elevations of 'Malmo', a property located on Brighton Road within the Foxrock Architectural Conservation Area. The planning authority refused permission because the proposed replacement design was deemed contextually inappropriate due to its excessive scale, bulk, and pastiche architectural treatment. It was concluded that the development would negatively impact the visual amenities and character of the ACA, violating Policy Objective ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.