Core Reason for the Refused Part
The Inspector recommended a grant of permission, overturning the Planning Authority's refusal for the retention of the 2.1m side boundary wall. The Inspector found that the wall does not create a material traffic hazard, is supported by the adjacent neighbor, and aligns with the established character and property boundaries of the estate.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The substantive house developments, including the attic conversion and dormer window, are consistent with the 'RS' residential zoning objective and do not impact neighbor amenities.
- The retention of the 2.1m boundary wall is acceptable as it follows the property boundary and does not significantly impede sightlines for the adjacent property, whose owner provided letters of support.
- The overall development is consistent with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area, as the wall treatment is a common feature throughout the mature residential estate.
Cited Policies (CDP)
RS Zoning ObjectiveChapter 13 (Land Use Zoning)Chapter 14 (Development Management)Section 14.17.6 (Road Safety)Policy Objective DMSO118 (Road Safety Measure)
Decision Document Summary
The application seeks permission for an attic conversion, dormer window, and internal works at 1 Holywell Row, Swords, as well as the retention of a rebuilt 2.1m high side boundary wall. Fingal County Council issued a split decision, refusing the wall's retention on the grounds that it endangered public safety by obstructing sightlines for the neighboring driveway at No. 8 Holywell Dale (Objective DMSO118). The Inspector's assessment focused on this refusal, noting that the resident of No. 8 act...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.