Core Refusal Reason
Failure to meet the statutory requirements for an Extension of Duration of Permission under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The Planning Authority is not satisfied that the development permitted under Ref. D18B/0317 has actually commenced.
- There is no evidence that substantial works have been carried out in relation to the original permission.
- The applicant failed to demonstrate that the proposed development would be completed within a reasonable timeframe.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for a previously permitted single-storey flat-roofed extension at 1A The Courtyard, Sandycove. The Planning Authority refused the extension because the project failed to meet the mandatory criteria set out in Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act. Specifically, the authority found that development had not commenced, no substantial works were performed, and there was no assurance of completion within a reasonable period, leading to the con...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.