D24A/0221

Permission for subdivision of the existing site and construction of a new two st

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

While the Planning Authority refused permission due to concerns over visual obtrusiveness and the impact on the established building line, the Inspector recommended a grant, concluding that the contemporary dormer design is appropriate for this unique triangular corner site and complies with the Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Development Plan.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The principle of providing a new infill residential unit on this zoned site is acceptable and consistent with Policy Objective PHP19 regarding the densification of built-up areas.
  • The proposed contemporary dormer design, while minimally taller than the existing bungalow, is of an appropriate scale and massing that will not negatively impact the streetscape or the residential amenities of neighboring properties.
  • The positioning of the dwelling forward of the established building line is justified by the site's unique triangular configuration and corner location, and will not set an undesirable precedent for the area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy Objective PHP19: Existing Housing Stock – AdaptationSection 12.3.7.5: Corner and Side Garden SitesSection 12.3.7.7: Infill DevelopmentZoning Objective A

Decision Document Summary

The proposal involves the subdivision of an existing 0.0264ha semi-detached corner plot at 20 Springfield Park, Foxrock, to construct a new 119sqm, two-storey detached dormer dwelling. The Planning Authority (DLRCC) initially refused permission, citing concerns that the structure would be visually dominant and out of character with the area. In her assessment, the Inspector noted that the housing estate features significant architectural variation due to numerous modern renovations and dormer ex...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP