Core Refusal Reason
Failure to provide requested information regarding substantial works within the statutory timeframe for an extension of duration application.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant failed to respond to a request for further information within the mandatory four-week period prescribed by Article 45(3) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001.
- Insufficient evidence was provided to establish that substantial works had been carried out pursuant to the original permission (18/5778) as required by Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
- Due to the non-compliance with the statutory request for information, the Planning Authority was legally obliged to refuse the extension of duration.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought an extension of duration for a previously permitted development involving the demolition of a house and the construction of three detached dwellings at Courtstown, Little Island, Co. Cork. The application was refused because the applicant failed to respond to a Further Information request within the required four-week window. This request was intended to verify if substantial works had been completed to justify the extension under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Ac...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.