Core Refusal Reason
Non-compliance with family flat standards, inadequate parking and site access arrangements resulting in a traffic hazard, and technical inconsistencies regarding roof light design.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposal failed to demonstrate compliance with Section 12.6.8 of the 2022-2028 CDP due to the lack of occupant details and the inclusion of an inappropriate separate front access door for the family flat.
- The development would endanger public safety by creating a traffic hazard through reduced sightlines for a new vehicle access and insufficient on-curtilage parking space.
- Inconsistencies between the roof plans and elevations, combined with the potential for balconette-style roof lights, were deemed harmful to the residential amenities and visual character of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.6.8
Decision Document Summary
The applicant proposed a ground floor side extension at 41A Dangan Park, Kimmage, to serve as a family flat. The local authority refused permission because the application lacked specific details regarding the intended occupants and failed to meet design standards for family flats, particularly concerning separate access. Additionally, the proposal raised significant traffic safety concerns due to inadequate parking layouts and poor sightlines for vehicle access, while technical discrepancies in...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.