SD24A/0095W

Planning Permission for (1) The demolition of the existing garage building to the rear of the existing dwelling (2) The construction of 1no. 2 bedroom 3 person detached single storey pitched roof mews dwelling with a single storey flat roof rear projection located to the rear of the existing dwelling and fronting onto Brideswell Lane (3) The vehicular entrance is off Brideswell Lane (4) Connection to all public services and all necessary ancillary site development works to facilitate this development at the rear of 101 Boot Road, Clondalkin, Dublin 22, D22 V3Y6.04

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

While the Planning Authority refused permission due to laneway inadequacy and traffic hazards, the Inspector recommends granting permission on the basis that the development is consistent with the 'RES' zoning objective, follows established precedents for infill residential development on Brideswell Lane, and provides a suitable level of amenity without creating an undue traffic hazard.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The principle of residential development is acceptable under the 'RES' zoning objective and aligns with national and local policies promoting compact growth and urban infill.
  • Given the existing precedents for mews-style dwellings on Brideswell Lane and the laneway's 6-meter width, the proposed access and traffic movements are considered safe and sustainable.
  • The proposed dwelling respects the character of the area and the amenities of neighboring properties, meeting required standards for separation distances, sunlight, and private open space.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Section 12.6.7Section 12.6.8Section 12.6.10Section 12.7.4Section 12.7.6Section 12.11.1Table 12.26

Decision Document Summary

The proposal involves the demolition of a rear garage structure at 101 Boot Road, Clondalkin, and the construction of a single-storey, two-bedroom mews dwelling fronting onto Brideswell Lane. The Planning Authority initially refused the application, citing poor road dimensions, lack of pedestrian infrastructure, and concerns that the project represented haphazard backland development. However, the Inspector notes that permission has previously been granted for five similar dwellings on the same ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.