Core Refusal Reason
The proposed garage is visually intrusive within a High Value Landscape, conflicts with specific zoning for open space and percolation protection, and poses potential traffic safety risks.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development would be visually discordant and prominent within a High Value Landscape, encroaching on the skyline and failing to integrate with the existing streetscape.
- The proposal conflicts with zoning objectives intended to protect open space and existing percolation areas, representing a disorderly form of development.
- Insufficient information was provided to demonstrate that the garage would not result in hazardous reverse traffic manoeuvres onto the public road.
Cited Policies (CDP)
GI 14-9GI 14-10GI 14-12GI 14-13CS-GC-06ZU 18-13
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought permission to construct a domestic garage at 'Glenisla', Myrtleville, a location situated within a High Value Landscape and along a scenic route. The Planning Authority refused the application primarily due to the structure's prominent position forward of the building line, which was deemed injurious to the visual amenities and character of the area. Additionally, the site is subject to specific zoning protections for open space and percolation areas, and the proposal failed...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.