Core Reason for the Refused Part
The Planning Authority issued a split decision, refusing the retention of the widened vehicular entrance for exceeding the 3-metre maximum width set out in the Development Plan; however, the Inspector recommends overturning this to a full grant, finding the 3.8m width safe and consistent with the street character.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The additional entrance width of 0.8m is not significant, does not create a traffic hazard, and actually improves visibility and safety for pedestrians.
- The proposed works are consistent with the established character of Clyde Road, where many original residential entrances feature similar or greater widths.
- The metal window cladding is a high-quality contemporary addition that does not negatively impact the character of the conservation area or the privacy of neighbors.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028Zoning Objective Z2Appendix 5, Section 4.3.1 (Dimensions and Surfacing)Appendix 5, Section 4.3.7 (Parking in Conservation Areas)Chapter 15 (Development Standards)
Decision Document Summary
This report assesses a first-party appeal against a split decision regarding 35 Clyde Road, a 1980s semi-detached house in a Z2 Conservation Area. The applicants sought retention for metal-clad box dormer windows and a 3.8m wide reconfigured entrance. Dublin City Council granted the windows but refused the entrance for non-compliance with Appendix 5 of the CDP. The Inspector argues for a flexible application of standards, noting that the wider entrance is safer than the previous narrow timber ga...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP