Core Refusal Reason
Failure to demonstrate that substantial works were carried out during the appropriate period of the original permission.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence that substantial works were completed before the expiration of the original permission.
- The criteria set out in Section 42(1)(a) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) regarding the commencement and progress of development have not been met.
- The Planning Authority determined that an extension of duration is not warranted as the development did not progress significantly during the initial five-year term.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for a previously permitted development at Belgravia, 9A Victoria Terrace, Dundrum, Dublin 14. The local authority refused the request because the applicant did not satisfy the statutory requirements under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act. Specifically, the authority concluded that substantial works had not been carried out during the original permission's lifespan, making the project ineligible for a time extension....SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.