Core Refusal Reason
The proposal was refused due to public safety hazards from footpath obstruction, adverse impacts on the character of a Protected Structure and Architectural Conservation Area, and non-compliance with parking reduction standards for urban neighborhoods.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed parking space would result in vehicles overhanging and obstructing the public footpath, creating a significant hazard for pedestrians and road users.
- The removal of the boundary wall would cause the loss of an integral heritage feature, negatively impacting the setting of the Protected Structure and the Dalkey Architectural Conservation Area.
- Given the site's proximity to Dalkey Dart Station and its 'Urban Neighbourhood' status, the provision of new car parking is contrary to national guidelines which require parking to be minimized or eliminated in such locations.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.4.8.1Policy HER8Section 12.11.2.1Section 12.11.2.3Section 12.4.8.4
Decision Document Summary
The development proposed the construction of a new vehicular entrance and a single parking space at 2 Seafield Terrace, Dalkey, a location containing a Protected Structure and situated near the Dalkey Architectural Conservation Area. The Planning Authority refused permission because the layout would lead to vehicles obstructing the public footpath, endangering public safety. Furthermore, the removal of the historic boundary wall was deemed detrimental to the architectural heritage and streetscap...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.