Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed additional fencing along the front boundary would negatively impact visual amenities and is inconsistent with the Special Amenity Area Order (SAAO) objectives for the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed fencing would result in a significant negative impact on the visual amenities of the surrounding environment.
- The development is contrary to the spirit and objectives of the Special Amenity Area Order (SAAO) applicable to the location.
- The additional fencing would exacerbate the urbanized appearance of the existing wall, failing to meet proper planning and sustainable development standards.
Cited Policies (CDP)
SAAO
Decision Document Summary
The application at Cova Nua, Porterstown, sought retention permission for re-rendering and permission for additional fencing along the front boundary. The planning authority issued a split decision, granting retention for the rendering subject to conditions regarding drainage and site access, but refusing the fencing. The refusal was primarily due to the fencing's detrimental effect on the visual character of the area and its failure to align with the Special Amenity Area Order (SAAO), as it wou...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.