3976/24
The proposed development will consist of the demolition and removal of a single storey extension to the rear of the dwelling; insertion of new vehicular access gates beside the existing pedestrian gate on the front boundary; construction of a single storey porch to the front elevation; construction of a part single-storey, part two-storey extension to the rear of the dwelling; remodelling of existing ground and first floor accommodation and all associated site works.
Core Planning Reasoning
The development is recommended for grant as it is considered to be in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area and would not seriously injure the residential amenities of properties in the vicinity, striking a reasonable balance between the need for house modernization and the impact on neighbors in an urban context.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed two-storey extension is not considered excessive in height or depth (4m) when compared to similar existing developments on neighboring properties (No. 44 and No. 45) and the general vicinity.
- Potential overshadowing and loss of light to the adjoining property at No. 45 are mitigated by that property's south-facing orientation and the dual-aspect nature of its main living room.
- The revised design submitted via further information, which includes reduced parapet heights for the garden room and a standardized vehicular entrance width (2.7m), successfully addresses the Planning Authority's initial concerns.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The application seeks permission for the comprehensive renovation and extension of a mid-terrace house at 46 O'Connell Gardens, Sandymount. The project includes a part-single/part-two-storey rear extension, a new front porch, and a new vehicular entrance. The site is located in a dense urban area immediately adjacent to the Aviva Stadium. A third-party appeal was lodged by the neighbor at No. 45, citing concerns over loss of natural light, privacy, and an 'overbearing' impact. The Inspector's as...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP