Core Refusal Reason
The proposed development functions as an independent, separate dwelling unit rather than subordinate ancillary family accommodation, violating Dublin City Development Plan standards.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The configuration and layout of the proposed structure indicate it would function as a separate, independent dwelling unit rather than an ancillary flat.
- The proposal fails to adhere to the specific criteria for Ancillary Family Accommodation as defined in Appendix 18 of the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028.
- Granting permission would establish an undesirable precedent for similar inappropriate backland developments and would be contrary to the proper planning of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 7 Ancillary Family AccommodationAppendix 18 Ancillary Residential AccommodationDublin City Development Plan 2022-2028
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought permission for a detached single-storey family flat to the rear of 60 Edenmore Crescent, Dublin 5. Dublin City Council refused the application because the design and function of the unit were deemed to constitute an independent residence rather than subordinate ancillary accommodation. The development was found to be in direct conflict with the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028 and was considered to set a negative precedent for future residential development in the local...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.