F26A/0315E

Retention of a horticultural shed, apiarist processing area,

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The development materially contravenes the 'RB' zoning objective as the applicant failed to demonstrate a legitimate horticultural or commercial need for the structure in a rural area.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The applicant failed to provide evidence of a legitimate horticultural use or the existence of a commercial business requiring the structure.
  • The development materially contravenes the 'RB' zoning objective and conflicts with the strategic aims of the Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029.
  • Granting retention would compound unauthorized development and set an undesirable precedent for unsustainable development in a rural area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

RBFingal Development Plan 2023-2029

Decision Document Summary

The proposal sought the retention of a horticultural shed and apiarist processing area at Murray’s Lane, Hayestown, Rush. The Planning Authority refused the application on the grounds that the applicant failed to justify the necessity of the structure for horticultural or commercial purposes within a rural setting. As a result, the development was found to materially contravene the 'RB' zoning objective of the Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029 and was deemed to set an undesirable precedent for u...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.