Core Refusal Reason
The proposal constitutes an unjustified substantial reconstruction of the dwelling with a design that is visually incongruous and detrimental to the residential amenity of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The extent of demolition lacks a detailed structural assessment and fails to justify the substantial reconstruction, contradicting policies favoring the retention and reuse of existing housing stock.
- The flat-roofed, box-like design of the first-floor extension is visually obtrusive and fails to respect the established pitched-roof character of the streetscape or the symmetry of the semi-detached pair.
- The inclusion of a first-floor terrace and specific openings would lead to significant overlooking and a loss of privacy for the adjoining residential property.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.3.7.1Section 12.3.9Policy Objective CA6Policy Objective PHP19
Decision Document Summary
The application sought permission for the retention of partial demolition works and the development of an extension at 33 Whitebarn Road, Churchtown. The Planning Authority refused the application because the works amounted to a substantial reconstruction without adequate structural justification, violating sustainable development goals regarding the reuse of housing stock. Additionally, the proposed first-floor extension's modern flat-roof design was deemed incompatible with the local architect...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.