WEB2134/26
The development will consist of the construction of a new first floor extension to the side and rear of the existing dwelling, featuring a flat roof with integrated rooflights. The proposal also includes associated internal alterations and reconfiguration of the existing dwelling, along with elevational changes and the selective demolition of existing elements to facilitate the works, including the removal of sections of roof and existing side and rear structures. In addition, the development will provide for the widening of the existing vehicular entrance. All works will be carried out in conjunction with associated site development works, including landscaping, drainage, services, and all other ancillary and consequential works necessary to facilitate the development.
Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed widening of the vehicular entrance would result in the loss of public on-street parking, which is contrary to development plan policies regarding the management of kerbside activity and residential amenity.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The widening of the entrance would necessitate the removal of on-street parking spaces, conflicting with the city's strategy to manage kerbside needs for residents, visitors, and businesses.
- The reduction in the supply of on-street parking would detract from the convenience of road users and the residential amenity of surrounding properties.
- Granting permission for the entrance widening would set an undesirable precedent for similar developments on adjacent roads, contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involved the construction of a first-floor extension and the widening of an existing vehicular entrance at 14 Churchill Terrace, Ballsbridge. While the residential extension was granted permission, the planning authority issued a split decision refusing the widening of the entrance from 2.689m to 3.7m. The refusal was primarily due to the loss of public on-street parking, which was found to contravene Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028 policies aimed at balancing the needs of va...PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.