Core Refusal Reason
The application failed to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as the development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out prior to the request for an extension.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant explicitly stated in the application form that works on the permitted development (Ref. No. 21/521) have not yet commenced.
- A site inspection carried out on June 5th, 2026, confirmed that no physical development or substantial works have been undertaken on the site.
- The proposal does not comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 42(1)(a)(i) (I) and (II) of the Planning and Development Act, 2000 (as amended), which require commencement and substantial progress for an extension of duration.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
Stacey & Gary Doheny sought a five-year extension of duration for a previously permitted dwelling house, garage, and effluent treatment system at a rural site in Garbally, Kilmeedy, Co. Limerick (Original Ref. No. 21/521). The application was refused by Limerick City & County Council because the development had not yet commenced. Under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, an extension can only be granted if substantial works have been carried out during the appropriate period, a ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.