2661010

The primary reason for refusal is the unsatisfactory nature of the proposed vehicular access, which lacks adequate sightlines and would require significant roadside boundary intervention, thereby creating a traffic hazard and endangering public safety.

• The proposed vehicular access is deemed unsatisfactory as it precludes the provision and maintenance of safe access due to a lack of demonstrated sightlines.
• The significant scale of roadside boundary intervention required to achieve access would negatively impact the public road and the safety of vulnerable road users.
• Permitting the development would endanger public safety by creating a traffic hazard and obstructing road users, in contravention of Policy Objective NNR2 and DM Standards 28 and 33a of the County Development Plan.