Core Refusal Reason
Failure to meet statutory requirements for an extension of duration regarding commencement and substantial works.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The Planning Authority is not satisfied that the development permitted under Ref. D19B/0345 has commenced.
- The applicant failed to demonstrate that substantial works have been carried out pursuant to the original permission.
- The application does not meet the mandatory criteria set out in Section 42(1)(a)(i) of the Planning and Development Act, as amended.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for a previously granted permission for a two-storey extension to the front, side, and rear of a dwelling at 69 St Helen's Road, Booterstown. The Planning Authority refused the extension because the development had not yet commenced and no substantial works had been undertaken during the original life of the permission. As a result, the proposal failed to satisfy the legal requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act, which gover...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.