WEB1987/24
The proposed development will consist of the installation of rooftop ballast mounted telecommunications equipment including no. 6 antennae, no. 2 dishes, remote radio units (RRU's), GPS, cable trays, access ladder and all associated site development works to provide for high-speed wireless data and broadband services
Granted
Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommends granting permission as the proposal is consistent with the Z3 zoning objective, complies with national guidelines for telecommunications infrastructure, and would not significantly impact visual or residential amenities in the urban context.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The principle of development is acceptable as telecommunications infrastructure is defined as a permissible public service installation under the Z3 'neighbourhood centre' zoning.
- The visual impact of the rooftop structures is considered non-significant and acceptable given the varied urban landscape and the effective visual absorption provided by the existing building's context.
- The applicant has adequately demonstrated compliance with international radiation guidelines, and health concerns from emissions are otherwise outside the planning remit as per Circular PL 07/12.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028Z3 zoning objectiveSection 14.7.3Appendix 15Section 9.5.11Policy SI45Policy SI48Section 15.18.5
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involves the installation of ballast-mounted telecommunications equipment (6 antennae, 2 dishes, and associated works) on the rooftop of Block A, Herberton Apartments, Rialto. The site is a mixed-use residential and commercial building located near St. James's Hospital. The Inspector addressed third-party appeals which raised concerns over health impacts, structural integrity, and visual injury. Key arguments in favor of the development include its necessity for digital connectivity...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP