LRD24A/0636/WEB

The proposed development comprising amendments to the permitted LRD (Ref. LRD23A

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

Analysis pending...

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The reduction in car parking from 80 to 57 spaces (0.60 per unit) is justified given the site's proximity to high-frequency public transport and various urban services, complying with SPPR 3 and SPPR 4.
  • The replacement of residential amenity floorspace with retail, bin, and bicycle storage at the ground floor level does not undermine the 'NC' zoning objective and ensures the scheme remains commercially dominant at street level.
  • The reconfiguration of the basement and relocation of ancillary services are within acceptable design parameters and will not lead to significant environmental or traffic safety issues.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Objective 'NC' (Neighbourhood Centre)Policy Objective RET7 (Neighbourhood Centres)Section 7.5.4.1 (Function of neighbourhood centres)Section 12.3.1.1 (Design Criteria)Section 12.3.4.7 (Refuse Storage and Services)Section 12.3.5 (Apartment Development)Section 12.4.5.1 (Parking Zones)Section 12.4.5.2 (Application of Standards)Section 12.4.5.6 (Residential Parking)Section 12.6.1 (Assessment of Development Proposals in Towns, District and Neighbourhood Centres)

Decision Document Summary

Red Rock Glenageary Limited sought amendments to a permitted large-scale residential development (LRD) on a 0.74ha infill site at the junction of Sallynoggin Road and Glenageary Avenue. The proposal includes reducing the basement size by approximately 1,169sqm, decreasing car parking from 80 to 57 spaces, and relocating bicycle and bin stores to the ground floor. This relocation resulted in the omission of previously permitted internal residential amenities (gym, co-working space). Third-party a...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP