Core Planning Reasoning
The proposed single-storey rear extension is recommended for grant as it is consistent with the residential zoning objective (Z1), maintains adequate private open space in accordance with national guidelines, and does not adversely impact the visual or residential amenities of adjoining properties due to its modest scale and footprint.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The 7.6 sqm extension is minor in scale and will not result in overbearing, overlooking, or adverse impacts on the residential amenities of neighboring properties at Sydenham Road or Merrion Road.
- The residual private open space of 34 sqm satisfies the requirement of 30 sqm for a two-bedroom house as set out in SPPR2 of the Sustainable Residential Development and Compact Settlement Guidelines (2024).
- Matters regarding the access laneway width and safety were effectively adjudicated under the parent permission (ABP306245-19), and the current proposal does not materially alter the spatial relationship or reduce the functional width of the lane.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028Zoning Objective Z1 (Map H)Chapter 15, Section 15.11Appendix 18, Section 1.1 (General Design Principles)Appendix 18, Section 1.2 (Rear Extensions)Section 5.11.3 (Private Open Space)Section 15.13.5.4 (Mews Laneways)Appendix 5, Section 4.3.8
Decision Document Summary
This report assesses a proposal for a 7.6 sqm single-storey rear extension to an authorized (but not yet fully built) mews house at No. 1 Sydenham Road, Ballsbridge. The site is located in a restricted rear garden area accessed via a narrow laneway. A third-party appeal from a neighbor raised concerns regarding overdevelopment, reduced open space, and the safety/width of the laneway, suggesting the application should have been for retention. The Inspector found that while foundations for the mew...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP