Core Planning Reasoning
The proposed development is considered an acceptable form of development that would not seriously injure the residential amenity of surrounding properties or present a traffic safety hazard, and is in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed height, scale, and massing of the ground floor extension are appropriate for the site and would not unduly impact the residential amenities of neighboring properties or cause significant overshadowing.
- Similar precedents for extensions exist at adjacent properties (Nos. 13 and 17), and the proposed works represent common practice for refurbishing dwellings to meet modern living requirements.
- The condition restricting car parking to a single space is unjustified as the development is an extension of an existing dwelling rather than a new unit, and will not result in an intensification of use.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Zoning Objective ASection 12.3.7.1Section 12.3.7.1(ii) (Rear Extensions)Section 12.3.7.1(iv) (Alterations at Roof/Attic Level)Section 12.3.7.4 (Detached Habitable Room)
Decision Document Summary
This report concerns a First-Party Appeal against conditions attached to a grant of planning permission for the redevelopment of a semi-detached house at 15 The Rise, Mount Merrion. The proposal includes a part two-storey rear extension, an attic conversion with a dormer window, and the conversion of an existing garage. The site is situated in an established residential area zoned 'A'. The Planning Authority (DLRCC) imposed conditions (4, 5, and 8a) intended to reduce the height and depth of the...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP