F25A/1067E

The development consists of retention of a horticultural shed, apiaris

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The development materially contravenes the 'RB' zoning objective due to a lack of commercial justification for its rural location and provides insufficient technical details regarding drainage infrastructure.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The applicant failed to demonstrate the existence of a legitimate commercial business or provide justification for its location in a rural area, resulting in a material contravention of the 'RB' zoning objective.
  • The development would compound the use of unauthorised development on the site and set an undesirable precedent for unsustainable development in the locality.
  • The submission lacked essential engineering reports and data concerning surface and foul water drainage, potentially endangering public health and safety.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029Zoning Objective RBObjective DMSO196Objective DMSO197

Decision Document Summary

The proposal sought the retention of a horticultural shed and apiarist processing facility at Murray’s Lane, Hayestown, Rush. The local authority refused permission primarily because the applicant did not establish a site-specific need for the commercial operation within a rural 'RB' zoned area, nor did they provide sufficient evidence that the development could be adequately serviced by drainage infrastructure. As a result, the development was found to conflict with the Fingal Development Plan ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.