Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority refused permission on the grounds that the proposed height increase on a prominent corner site would be visually obtrusive, discordant with the established residential character, and set an unwanted negative precedent for boundary treatments in the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed 400mm height increase is justified to provide necessary privacy for the property's primary private open space, which is located to the side of the dwelling rather than the rear.
- The use of matching materials, colors, and textures ensures that the raised wall will harmonize with the existing structure and the wider streetscape.
- Given the significant existing variation in boundary treatments along Adelaide Road, the proposal will not negatively impact visual amenity or result in a detrimental impact on the public realm.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.8.7.2Section 12.4.8.2
Decision Document Summary
The application seeks planning permission to raise the height of an existing boundary wall at 22 Adelaide Road, a corner site at the junction with Spencer Villas. The Planning Authority initially refused the development, citing concerns over visual obtrusiveness and conflict with County Development Plan policies regarding streetscape character. The Inspector, however, argues that the site context—specifically the location of the private amenity space to the side of the house—necessitates a highe...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
View the appeal at An Bord Pleanála