Core Refusal Reason
The Planning Authority initially refused permission because the proposed 104 sq.m structure exceeded the 80 sq.m floor space limit for domestic garages/stores specified in the Wexford County Development Plan; however, the Inspector recommended a grant of permission, concluding that the proposal qualified for an exception due to the site's large scale and the applicant's specific coastal storage needs.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed development, while exceeding the standard 80 sq.m floor area limit, is justified as an exception under Section 3.2 of the Development Plan given the substantial site area (2,444 sq. m) and the capacity of the site to accommodate the structure without visual detriment.
- The design, height (under 5m), and use of scorched larch cladding allow the building to assimilate appropriately into the landscape, ensuring no significant adverse impacts on the residential amenities or privacy of neighboring properties.
- The proposal is for a purpose ancillary to the main dwelling and, due to its scale and location within a built-up area connected to public infrastructure, it will not have a significant effect on any European Site.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 3.2 of Volume 2 of the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028Courtown Riverchapel Local Area Plan 2015-2021 (as extended to 2026)
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought permission for a 104 sq.m free-standing garden building comprising a 49 sq.m garage and a 55 sq.m gym/fitness room at an elevated coastal site in Seamount, Ardamine, Co. Wexford. The Planning Authority refused the application solely because it exceeded the 80 sq.m limit set for domestic stores in the Wexford County Development Plan 2022-2028. On appeal, the Inspector noted that the site is exceptionally large and that the plan allows for flexibility regarding floor area base...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.