4347/24

PERMISSION for The construction of a new infill Single Storey, 2 bedroom detached house. Plus All Associated Site Works including vehicle new entrance, All at Site Adiacent to 39 & 41A Edenmore Crescent, Raheny, Dublin 5

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The proposed development is considered consistent with the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028, particularly policies regarding urban consolidation and infill development, and would not seriously injure the residential or visual amenities of the area.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The principle of residential development is acceptable under the 'Z1' zoning objective and aligns with strategic policies favoring urban consolidation and the densification of suburbs.
  • The single-storey design and modest scale ensure that the development will not be overbearing or result in significant overshadowing of adjacent properties, maintaining the character of the streetscape.
  • While the private open space falls below the specific 60-70sqm Development Plan requirement, the provided 40sqm is sufficient for a two-bedroom house on a constrained site and exceeds national minimum guidelines.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Zone Z1 Sustainable Residential NeighbourhoodSection 5 (Quality Housing and Sustainable Neighbourhoods)Policy QHSN6 Urban ConsolidationPolicy QHSN10 Urban DensityObjective QHSN04 Densification of SuburbsSection 15.5.2 Infill DevelopmentSection 15.11 Housing DevelopmentsSection 15.11.2 Aspect, Daylight/Sunlight and VentilationSection 15.11.3 Private Open SpaceSection 15.13.3 Infill /Side Garden Housing DevelopmentsAppendix 16 Daylight and SunlightAppendix 5 Transport and Mobility

Decision Document Summary

The applicant sought permission for a single-storey, two-bedroom detached house on a 203sqm corner plot adjacent to 39 & 41A Edenmore Crescent, Raheny. The site is an underutilised grassed area originally belonging to No. 39. Dublin City Council granted permission subject to conditions, which was subsequently appealed by a third party citing concerns over visual impact, building line breaches, and overdevelopment. The Inspector found that the proposal represents a logical use of a vacant site in...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP