Core Refusal Reason
The development constitutes inappropriate overdevelopment that negatively impacts residential amenity through its scale and lack of drainage mitigation.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The canopy structure represents significant overdevelopment that is visually intrusive and has an overbearing impact on neighboring dwellings.
- The development results in insufficient private amenity space for the dwelling and would set an undesirable precedent for similar developments in the area.
- The proposal renders the site impermeable and lacks an acceptable drainage proposal to mitigate environmental impacts, contravening sustainable development objectives.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective SPQHO45Objective DMSO205Objective GINHO15RS – Residential zoning
Decision Document Summary
This application sought retention permission for a 47.3sqm single-storey translucent canopy cover at the rear of a residential property at 44 Beechfield Heights, Clonee. The local authority refused the proposal because its excessive scale and site coverage represent an overdevelopment that diminishes private amenity space and negatively affects the character of the vicinity. Furthermore, the development failed to address site drainage requirements necessitated by the increased impermeability, th...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.