WEB2317/24

Change of use from a two storey commercial office back to a two storey, two bedroom domestic dwelling including all associated internal alterations to the premises.

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The Inspector recommends that the planning authority's decision to attach Condition No. 2 be upheld, as the Section 48 Development Contribution was correctly calculated and applied in accordance with the Dublin City Council Development Contribution Scheme 2023-2026.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The 50% reduction for a change of use from commercial to residential was correctly applied by the Planning Authority under Section 11 of the contribution scheme.
  • The appellant's reliance on S.I. No. 75/2022 (Exempted Development) is not valid as the applicant sought full planning permission and failed to demonstrate compliance with the mandatory vacancy criteria.
  • The terms of the Section 48 Development Contribution Scheme were properly applied in respect of Condition No. 2, and the levy is a reasonable requirement for public infrastructure benefitting the area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Section 15.2.5 of the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028Zoning Z2 'Residential Neighbourhoods – Conservation Areas'Section 10 of the Section 48 Development Contribution Scheme 2023-2026Section 11 of the Section 48 Development Contribution Scheme 2023-2026

Decision Document Summary

This is a First Party appeal against Condition No. 2 of a grant of permission for the change of use of a two-storey red-brick Georgian terrace from a commercial office back to a domestic dwelling at 264 Merrion Road, Dublin 4. The site is zoned Z2 'Residential Neighbourhoods – Conservation Areas'. The appellant sought the removal of the €5,149.79 development contribution, arguing the house was originally residential and citing the applicant's age and recent changes to exempted development regula...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP