Core Refusal Reason
The proposed extension is considered a second dwelling unit rather than an extension, with an excessive scale and design that fails to respect the host dwelling and violates development plan policies.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The description of the development is misleading as the layout, including multiple kitchens and separate entrances, effectively creates an independent second dwelling unit.
- The size, scale, and positioning of the extension forward of the existing building line are excessive and fail to respect the character of the host dwelling and its setting.
- The proposal contravenes Fingal Development Plan 2023-2029 policies regarding family flats and residential extensions, representing improper planning and unsustainable development.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy SPQHP41Objective SPQHO45Section 14.10.3Policy SPQHP42Objective SPQH046
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought permission for a single-storey side and front flat roof extension at 33A River Valley Grove, Swords. The local authority refused the application on the grounds that the design and multiplicity of facilities indicated the creation of a second dwelling unit rather than a standard domestic extension. Additionally, the planning authority found the scale and forward-projecting building line to be excessive and out of character with the existing setting, leading to non-compliance w...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.