SD24A/0080W

Planning Permission sought for: Change of use of part first floor from function room to aparthotel and construction of 2 new floors over first floor complete (at second and third floor levels) to provide aparthotel and ancillary accommodation. The total no of aparthotel rooms provided is 22. Existing roof over first floor to be removed complete to facilitate this development. Other works include: (1) Reduction in size of Ground Floor Lounge floor area to provide new separate stairs and lift to serve the aparthotel rooms on the first, new second and new third floors. External entrance doors to the stairs / lift area are the previous entrance doors to the Lounge area. (2) Internal alterations at ground and first floor levels to facilitate this development. (3) Roof garden accessed via the new stairs and lift. (4) Alterations to the existing building elevations finishes and (5) Connection to all services and all ancillary site development works to facilitate this development.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed development was refused due to excessive scale, mass, and height, which would be out of character with the surrounding neighborhood and visually dominant, combined with a significant deficit in on-site car parking provision that would lead to traffic hazards and prejudicial conditions for public safety.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed building height of 16.6 metres and overall massing represent an overdevelopment of a constrained site, failing to provide a suitable transition to the surrounding 1-2 storey residential context.
  • The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient car parking (standard and mobility impaired) within their legal control, relying on an adjacent church car park without documented consent and using incorrect calculations for retail parking requirements.
  • While the use of an aparthotel is acceptable in principle under the 'LC' zoning, the lack of a robust Design Statement and the failure to address the visual dominance of the structure renders the proposal contrary to proper planning and sustainable development.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy CS5Policy GI1Policy GI2Policy GI3Policy GI4Policy QDP1 Objective 4Policy QDP1 Objective 5Policy QDP2 Objective 1Policy QDP3 Objective 1Policy QDP3 Objective 3Policy QDP4 Objective 2Policy QDP7Policy QDP8Policy QDP9 Objective 1Policy H8Policy H9Policy H14Policy SM2Policy SM7Section 7.10Policy COS5Policy EDE8Policy EDE14Policy EDE19Policy IE2Policy IE3Section 12.5.2Section 12.5.3Section 12.7.4Table 12.25

Decision Document Summary

The proposal sought permission for the change of use of the existing first-floor function room at Boomers Pub to an aparthotel, alongside the construction of two additional floors to provide 22 guest rooms. The site is located within the Dutch Village Neighbourhood Centre in Clondalkin, an area characterized by low-rise commercial and residential buildings. The Inspector's assessment focused on the visual impact of the increased height (from 10.22m to 16.6m) and the adequacy of parking. Although...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.