WEB2397/24

PERMISSION The development will consist of the erection of 2m high glazed screens to the front of the existing permitted ground floor unit.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed permanent front extension would break the established building line, resulting in a detrimental impact on the visual amenity of the streetscape, and poses an unacceptable risk of increased noise nuisance for nearby residents, contravening the Z1 zoning objective.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The permanent single-storey metal-framed extension would introduce an anomalous feature that breaks a consistent building line, harming the visual character of the wider streetscape.
  • The proposal would increase the restaurant's patron capacity by approximately 100%, creating an unacceptable risk of noise disturbance for the residential units located directly above and adjacent to the site.
  • The development fails to meet the Z1 zoning objective of the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028, as it does not sufficiently protect or improve the residential amenities of the area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Zoning Category Z1 (Sustainable Residential Neighbourhoods)Section 14.7.1 (Residential development vision)Zoning Category Z2 (Residential Neighbourhoods - Conservation Areas)Section 15.14.2 (Architectural Design Quality)Section 15.14.7.2 (Restaurants and Outdoor Dining)

Decision Document Summary

This report concerns a First Party appeal against Dublin City Council's decision to refuse permission for a 10.44 sqm permanent glazed extension and all-weather canopy to the front of an existing restaurant at 296C North Circular Road. The site is situated in a three-storey mixed-use building within a Z1 zoned area and is characterized by a consistent red-brick building line. The Inspector noted that while the current seating is unauthorized, the proposed permanent replacement would physically e...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP