Core Refusal Reason
The Inspector recommends granting retention permission, overturning the Planning Authority's refusal, on the basis that the development is of an appropriate scale and design that would not seriously injure the visual or residential amenities of the area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development is considered to be of a modest scale and height that does not result in significant overbearing or overshadowing impacts on adjacent residential properties.
- The various structures, including the garden room and side extension, are visually unobtrusive from the public realm and consistent with the residential zoning objective of the Fingal County Development Plan 2023-2029.
- Technical concerns regarding surface water drainage and potential flooding can be adequately managed through planning conditions requiring the submission and agreement of a SuDS-compliant drainage strategy.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy SPQHP41Objective SPQHO45Section 14.10.2 (Residential Extensions)Section 14.10.2.2 (Side Extensions)Section 14.10.2.3 (Ground Floor Extensions rear)Section 14.10.4 (Garden Rooms)
Decision Document Summary
This report pertains to a first-party appeal by Dhingra Gagan & Nisha John against Fingal County Council's decision to refuse retention permission for three elements at 38 Chapel Gate, Balbriggan: a 15sqm detached garden room, a 24sqm timber pergola, and a 13sqm side storage extension. The site is a corner plot within an established residential estate. While the Planning Authority refused permission due to concerns over visual obtrusiveness, scale, and inadequate drainage information, the Inspec...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.