SD24B/0491

Permission sought for retention of a 1.3 metre high glass balustrade comprised of as chrome rail and glazed panels on the flat roof of a previously approved single storey extension at rear (SD17A/0078). Planning Permission sought for the erection of a louvered screen comprised of horizontal powder coated aluminium rails on top of the balustrade to an overall height of 1.8 meters and the covering/screening of the existing glass panes with an orange film to screen the flats roof balcony space all at rear

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The Planning Authority initially refused permission due to potential adverse impacts on residential amenity and unacceptable overlooking, but the Inspector recommended a grant, concluding that the proposed 1.8m louvred screen and opaque film effectively mitigate these concerns.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed addition of a 1.8m high louvred screen and opaque film to the existing glass balustrade effectively eliminates any potential for unacceptable overlooking of adjacent residential properties.
  • The limited scale and depth of the balcony (approximately 1.4m) significantly restrict its intensity of use, further reducing any potential impact on the amenities of the surrounding area.
  • As the development is located at the rear of the property and within a context of varied existing extensions, it has no material impact on the character or streetscape of the Rathfarnham Village Architectural Conservation Area (ACA).

Cited Policies (CDP)

South Dublin County Development Plan 2022-2028RES zoning objectivePolicy NCBH20 Objective 3Policy H14Policy H14 Objective 1Section 12.6.8House Extension Design Guide 2010House Extension Design Guide 2025

Decision Document Summary

This appeal relates to the retention of a 1.3m high glass balustrade and the proposed addition of a louvred screen (bringing the total height to 1.8m) and opaque film on a first-floor balcony at 589 Woodview Cottages, Rathfarnham. The site is an early 20th-century mid-terrace house situated within an Architectural Conservation Area. South Dublin County Council had refused the application, citing concerns over overlooking and negative impacts on residential amenity under the 'RES' zoning objectiv...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.