Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended the omission of Condition 2(a) because the required reduction in extension length would not significantly improve the quality of private open space but would unnecessarily compromise the internal floor area required for the applicant's future mobility and accessibility needs.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The principle of the development is acceptable given its location in a residentially zoned area and the replacement of an existing substandard rear extension.
- While the private open space is below standard for new developments, current guidelines allow for a flexible, case-by-case approach for refurbishments on constrained urban infill sites.
- The proposed extension, with a ridge height increase of 0.6 metres, will not have significant negative impacts on the residential amenities of adjoining properties regarding overshadowing or loss of light.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028Zoning Objective Z1Chapter 15 Section 15.11.3Volume 2 Appendix 18 - Section 1.1Volume 2 Appendix 18 - Section 1.2
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involves the construction of a single-storey extension to the rear of a mid-terrace house at 27 Fergus Road, Terenure, to replace an existing extension and provide a bedroom and wet room for an applicant with future mobility concerns. Dublin City Council granted permission but imposed Condition 2(a), requiring the extension length be reduced from 4.8m to 4m to increase the courtyard's private amenity space. The first-party appeal argued that this reduction would impede wheelchair ac...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP