Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended the removal of Condition No. 4, concluding that requiring a set-back of the ground-floor extension to facilitate hypothetical future development would unduly compromise the internal functionality of the dwelling without providing significant visual or amenity benefits.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The required set-back would significantly reduce the usable space and functionality of the extension as a habitable bedroom, making the condition unduly onerous.
- The proposed single-storey extension is in keeping with the character of the existing dwelling and the overall pattern of development in the area, posing no threat to residential or visual amenities.
- The minimal visual gain achieved by matching the neighbor's set-back is outweighed by the loss of dwelling functionality, and removal of the condition accords with the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dublin City Council Development Plan 2022-2028Zoning Objective Z1Appendix 18 (Ancillary Residential Accommodation)Section 1.1 (General design principles)Section 1.3 (Extensions to the side)
Decision Document Summary
This report concerns a first-party appeal under Section 139 against Condition No. 4 of a grant of permission for a 60sq.m. single-storey side and rear extension at 78 Cabra Drive, Dublin 7. The Planning Authority sought to mandate a front set-back of the extension to 'future-proof' a potential first-floor addition, mirroring the neighboring property at no. 77. The site is a two-storey semi-detached house located in a mature residential cul-de-sac zoned Z1. The Inspector argued that the modificat...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP