REF15424

1. Convert garage into home office with bathroom, replace garage door with wind

Split decision

Core Reason for the Refused Part

The proposed rear garden entrance gate is considered development and is not exempted development because it provides access to a public road (the rear laneway) where the surfaced carriageway width exceeds 4 metres, thereby triggering the restriction under Article 9(1)(a)(ii) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 (as amended).

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The conversion of the garage and the internal modifications to the rear porch/kitchen area constitute development but are exempted development under Class 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 2 and Section 4(1)(h) of the Act, as they remain within floor area limits and do not materially affect the external appearance.
  • The proposed 1m wide pedestrian gate is development that would typically be exempt under Class 5, but is de-exempted by Article 9(1)(a)(ii) because the adjacent laneway is a public road with a width (measured at 5.7m) exceeding the 4m statutory threshold.
  • The Inspector recommends a split declaration, confirming that the building works are exempt while the creation of the rear pedestrian entrance requires planning permission.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Zoning Objective AAppendix 11 – Public Rights of Way

Decision Document Summary

This Inspector's Report concerns a Section 5 referral at 140 Balally Drive, Dundrum, where the applicant sought clarity on whether house modifications and a new rear access gate constituted exempted development. The site is a semi-detached house zoned Objective 'A' under the Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown County Development Plan 2022-2028. The proposal includes converting a garage to a home office, replacing the garage door with a window, merging a porch into the kitchen area, and installing a 1m wide g...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP