LRD24A/0974/WEB

We, Orchid Residential Limited, intend to apply for planning permission for a la

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The proposed development is consistent with the 'Objective A' zoning and local/national policy for compact growth; it provides purpose-built student accommodation in a suitable location near UCD without causing significant injury to residential amenity, visual impact, or traffic safety.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The development is acceptable in principle as student accommodation is 'Open for Consideration' under the residential zoning and the site is optimally located within 1km of UCD.
  • The proposed density of 161 uph and height of up to 6 storeys are justified by the site's urban context and compliance with the Building Height Strategy's performance-based criteria.
  • While minor adverse daylight/sunlight impacts occur on neighboring properties, they are not considered significant enough to warrant refusal when weighed against the benefits of the sustainable, car-free development.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Objective APolicy Objective PHP29: Provision of Student AccommodationPolicy Objective PHP18: Residential DensityPolicy Objective PHP20: Protection of Existing Residential AmenityPolicy Objective PHP42: Building Design & HeightSection 12.3.7.11: Student AccommodationSection 12.8.3.1: Public Open SpaceTable 12.8: Public Open Space RequirementsSection 12.4.5.1: Parking ZonesTable 12.5: Car Parking StandardsSection 12.3.1.1: Design CriteriaPolicy Objective BHS 1: Increased HeightPolicy Objective BHS 3: Building Height in Residual Suburban Areas

Decision Document Summary

This Inspector's Report assesses a Large-scale Residential Development (LRD) proposal for 220 student bedspaces at the Vector Motors site, Goatstown Road, Dublin 14. The scheme features a U-shaped configuration ranging from 1 to 6 storeys on a 0.34ha brownfield site. Following a history of legal challenges and previous refusals, the current proposal focuses on mitigating overbearing impacts and addressing daylight/sunlight concerns for the adjacent Trimbleston development. The Inspector argues t...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP