WEB5648/25

I, Bernard McGowan, intend to apply for planning permission for the development at No. 174-180 Harold's Cross Road, Harold's Cross, Terenure, D6W. (known as McGowans of Harolds Cross). The proposed development will consist of the following: Demolition of existing part 1 and 2-storey buildings including basement on site ; Construction of part 3 and part 4 -storey residential building, containing a total of 20 No. apartments comprising of 03 No. Studio Apartments, 07 No. 1-Bed Apartments, 07 No. 2-Bed Apartments and 03 No. 3-Bed Duplex Apartments and 1no. substation at ground floor level; communal amenity space at ground level. All with associated site works, bicycle store, bin storage, landscaping and services.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The development was deemed to negatively impact visual and residential amenities, specifically regarding inappropriate external finishes, inadequate balcony privacy, and insufficient protection of architectural and archaeological heritage.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed anthracite grey finishes on the upper floors of Harold's Cross Road and Kimmage Road were considered detrimental to the visual amenity of the area.
  • The design of balconies for Units 11 and 16 failed to provide adequate residential amenity due to a lack of opaque or frosted glass balustrades to prevent overlooking.
  • The proposal did not sufficiently provide for the preservation and recording of the site's architectural heritage and potential archaeological remains at 174-176 Harold's Cross Road.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Decision Document Summary

The proposal by Bernard McGowan involves the development of the 'McGowans of Harolds Cross' site at 174-180 Harold's Cross Road, Dublin 6W. Although the provided text follows the format of a grant with conditions, the decision is recorded as a refusal based on concerns regarding visual and residential amenity. Key issues identified include the unsuitability of specific external materials, the need for privacy modifications to residential units, and the requirement for comprehensive management pl...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP