Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration was refused because the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been carried out prior to the expiration of the original planning permission, failing to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended).
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant indicated in the application form that works have not commenced on the development permitted under planning reference 20/1082.
- A site inspection confirmed that the proposal does not meet the requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 as substantial works have not been carried out to date.
- The Planning Authority is not satisfied that the development was commenced or that substantial works were carried out pursuant to the permission during the appropriate period as required by Section 42(1)(a)(I) and (II) of the Act.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for planning permission (Ref. 20/1082) relating to the relocation of an existing site entrance and associated site works at Carrons, Kilcolman, Ardagh, Co. Limerick. The original permission was due to expire on 28th January 2026. The Planning Authority refused the extension because the applicant failed to demonstrate that the development had commenced or that substantial works had been carried out, which are mandatory legal requirements under Sect...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.