Core Refusal Reason
The proposal constitutes overdevelopment by creating two independent uses where the GP surgery is not subordinate to the residential use, while also providing substandard amenity space and featuring visually intrusive dormer extensions.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development would result in two separate and independent uses on-site, failing to comply with Objective DMSO83 as the GP surgery is not subordinate to the existing residential use.
- The proposal provides inadequate private amenity space for the residential unit, leading to a substandard form of development and overdevelopment of the site.
- The proposed dormer roof extensions are overbearing and incongruous, materially contravening design standards set out in Section 14.10.2.4 and Objective SPQHO45.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective DMSO83Section 14.10.2.4Objective SPQHO45
Decision Document Summary
The application proposed the extension and conversion of a dwelling at 16 Orchard Grove, Blanchardstown, to accommodate both a GP surgery and a residential unit. Located in an area zoned 'RS' (Residential), the local authority refused permission because the medical practice was not subordinate to the residential use, resulting in overdevelopment and insufficient private open space for occupants. Additionally, the design of the dormer extensions was deemed visually dominant and inconsistent with ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.