Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed steel shed was refused due to its excessive size, scale, and design, which were deemed non-ancillary to the main dwelling and contrary to the 'HA' (High Amenity) zoning objective.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The size and scale of the proposed steel shed are considered excessive and beyond the reasonable ancillary requirements of the existing residential dwelling.
- The development is inconsistent with the 'HA' zoning objective, which seeks to protect High Amenity lands from inappropriate and non-ancillary structures.
- Granting permission would establish an undesirable precedent for large-scale development that detracts from the visual amenities and proper planning of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
HA Zoning ObjectiveFingal Development Plan 2023-2029
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involved a single-storey rear extension and the construction of a steel shed at Rose Cottage, Lusk. The Planning Authority issued a split decision, granting permission for the extension (subject to a ridge height reduction) but refusing the shed. The refusal was based on the shed's disproportionate scale relative to the primary residence and its location within a 'High Amenity' (HA) zone, where the structure was deemed an inappropriate development that would negatively impact the ch...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.