Core Refusal Reason
The application for extension of duration was submitted after the statutory deadline and the development had not commenced.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The subject development has not commenced on-site prior to the application for an extension of duration.
- The application was submitted later than the mandatory 6-month cut-off period required for extending the appropriate period of permission.
- The proposal fails to comply with the statutory requirements set out in Section 42(1)(a)(III) and Section 42(1A)(a)(ii) of the Planning and Development Act, 2000, as amended.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for a previously permitted alteration and extension at 25 Balally Grove, Dundrum, Dublin 16. The local authority refused the extension because the development had not yet commenced and the application was lodged outside the statutory timeframe permitted under the Planning and Development Act. As the submission missed the 6-month cut-off period for such requests, it was deemed non-compliant with national planning legislation....SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.