Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration was refused because the planning authority determined that substantial works had not been carried out and the development had not effectively commenced, failing to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The planning authority concluded that the development had not commenced before the expiration of the appropriate period sought to be extended.
- Works carried out to date, specifically enabling works and the removal of roof slates, are not considered 'substantial works' as verified by site inspection.
- The proposal does not comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 42(1)(a)(i) (I) and (II) of the Planning and Development Act, 2000 (as amended).
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought an extension of duration for a previously granted permission (Ref. No. 21/112) to extend and alter a dwelling house, install a new wastewater treatment system, and demolish outbuildings at Gortnacreha Upper, Kilmeedy, Co. Limerick. Upon assessment and site inspection, the planning authority found that only minor enabling works and the removal of roof slates had occurred. Because these actions do not constitute 'substantial works' under Irish planning law, the application was...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.