Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration was refused because the development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out during the appropriate period of the original permission, failing to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development permitted under planning permission reference 21/564 has not commenced on site, as verified by a site inspection on 1st April 2026.
- No substantial works were carried out pursuant to the permission during the appropriate period sought to be extended.
- The application fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 42(1)(a)(i) (I) and (II) of the Planning and Development Act, 2000 (as amended).
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for the construction of a dwelling house, detached garage, and associated services at Ballynagally, Old Pallas, Co. Limerick, originally permitted under Ref. No. 21/564. Following a site inspection, the planning authority determined that no works had commenced on the site. Consequently, the application was refused as it failed to meet the statutory criteria under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, which requires that development ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.