Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration failed to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 as the development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out during the original permission period.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant confirmed within the application form that no works have commenced on the site since the original planning permission was granted.
- A site inspection conducted on 27th April 2026 verified that the development has not commenced, meaning the permission has not been activated.
- The proposal does not comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 42(1)(a)(i) (I) and (II) of the Planning and Development Act 2000, which requires commencement and substantial works prior to an extension.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought a three-year extension of duration for the construction of a poultry house, soiled water storage tank, and ancillary works at a rural site in Killeedy South, Ballagh, Co. Limerick (Original Ref. No. 20/1351). The Planning Authority refused the request because the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been undertaken during the initial permission period. Consequently, the application failed to satisfy the legal criteria for an extension under Section 42 o...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.