Core Refusal Reason
The proposed shed is not considered ancillary to the main dwelling due to its scale, separate entrance, and location, representing an inappropriate and haphazard development in a rural area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development cannot be considered ancillary to the main dwelling house as it utilizes a separate entrance and is located 35m away from the primary residence.
- The proposal fails to comply with the standards set out in Section 2.8 of the Mayo County Development Plan 2022-2028 regarding rural housing garages and sheds.
- Granting permission would set an undesirable precedent for similar non-ancillary structures and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 2.8
Decision Document Summary
Donal Jennings sought planning permission for the retention of a concrete base and access, and the completion of a 103m2 storage shed at Carrowbrinoge, Castlebar. The site already contains a dwelling and a domestic garage. Mayo County Council refused the application because the shed, intended for vintage cars and a caravan, was deemed non-ancillary to the main house due to its scale, distance from the dwelling, and independent access. The development was found to be in breach of Section 2.8 of t...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.